Germany Apologized for a Genocide. It’s Nowhere Near Enough.

January 03, 2024

Germany ended up paying Namibia $1.3bn after formally recognizing its colonial-era “genocide.” It’s still “not enough.”

By Kavena Hambira & Miriam Gleckman-Krut

Rebuttal By

The supine scum governing occupied Germany have once again wrongly shamed the name of a once-great people. As if the eternal groveling over felonious fables such as the culpability for both World Wars, “Kristallnacht” ™, “Nazi-looted art” ™ and “zee gas chambers” ™ weren’t enough — the Judaized Germans have, in recent years, been pounded over the head over their colonial-era “genocide” in what is today the southwestern African nation of Namibia. After 100 years of “hurtful denial,” the demented and de-balled democrats of Deutschland did finally “admit” to the “genocide.”
From the article:
“More than a century ago, Germany carried out a systematic massacre. From 1904 to 1908, in what is now Namibia, the German colonial government killed about 80,000 Herero and Nama people.
Germany at last acknowledged this massacre as genocidal. “In light of Germany’s historical and moral responsibility,” said Germany’s foreign minister, Heiko Maas, “we will ask Namibia and the descendants of the victims for forgiveness.” With this request for forgiveness came a “gesture” of $1.35 billion, to be spent on reconstruction and development projects and health care and training programs over 30 years. The Namibian government accepted. But many Nama and Herero feel it is nowhere near enough.”* One of the co-writers of this commie crap, Kavena Hambira, is a descendant of Herero “survivors” ™ — while the other, young Miriam Gleckman-Krut (cough cough), is a descendant of Holohoax “survivors” ™ — an anti-White match made in Hell. Ah, show us the shekels Kaveena and Miriam. Show us the shekels.

1. Kavena Hambira is chairman of the Namibia Institute for Democracy, a “civil society” (Globalist) organization. // 2. Generation Z Jewess Miriam Gleckman-Krud is a Ph.D. candidate in sociology at the University of Michigan. The two anti-Whites want more “reparations” for Namibia and would like the German educational system to mandate the teaching about the “massacre.” (Betcha’ shekels to bagels Miriam is riding dirty with the African.)

1. Self-flagellating Germans join up with money-grubbing local Africans to call for “reparations.”. // 2. In Namibia — “Gimme, gimme, gimme.”

Now, about this “genocide.” First of all, putting all cognitive bias aside, Germans simply don’t do that type of stuff unless they are threatened. Massacres are more of a British or Jewish thing. So, right away, the newly accepted account of this historical event stinks of fecal fiction. Toward the end of the 19th century, Germany, like all other European powers, sought some more “living space” outside of its industrializing and overpopulated confines. In the process of African exploration and colonization, the big bad White Man brought some really cool, never-before-seen stuff to the sparsely-populated continent — ya know, really hi-tech things like the wheel, the plow, 2-story structures, animal harnesses, roads, coal-burning power, shoes, written language, etc. The positive effects of advanced civilization benefited the natives. Some were grateful and friendly. Others, not so much.
A “rebellion” broke out in January 1904 and continued until March 1907. The leader of the Herero tribes, Samuel Maharero ordered the extermination of all German White people, but specifically excluded the English, whose own colonial holdings surrounded those of the Germans. Much like the slaughter of the French Whites of Haiti a century earlier, the preparations for the racial attack were kept secret. The White victims had no time to prepare or protect themselves from the coming bloodbath. Several hundred mounted Herero attacked — killing 123 Germans and torching buildings. Germans who had escaped the farm attacks flocked to urban areas for protection. Within days, the violence had spread north. A German military station was occupied and every soldier was put to death, many of them mutilated.
Just thought we would mention those wee little contextual details which Kaveena & Miriam conveniently deemed not “fit to print.” No “reparations” for descendants of the slaughtered Germans, eh?

1. Samuel Maharero — mass murderer of innocent German colonial farmers. // 2. The Hereros, NOT the Germans, were the ones aiming for a racial genocide! / 3. A 1904 US cartoon by Bob Satterfield depicts savages chasing the Germans — very “politically incorrect” by today’s standards.

News of the slaughter shocked the German mainland. General Lothar von Trotha was tasked with protecting the peaceful Germans of Africa — who, by the way, never owned slaves and only laid claim to virgin lands for their fruitful farming which benefited everyone. Von Trotha didn’t mess around. He spoke to the Herero barbarians in the only language they would understand — brute force.
Trotha’s Order:
“The Hereros are German subjects no longer. They have killed, stolen, cut off the ears and other parts of the body of wounded soldiers, and now are too cowardly to want to fight any longer. I announce to the people that whoever hands me one of the chiefs shall receive 1,000 marks, and 5,000 marks for Samuel Maherero. The Herero nation must now leave the country. If it refuses, I shall compel it to do so with the ‘long tube’ (cannon). Any Herero found inside the German frontier, with or without a gun or cattle, will be executed. I shall spare neither women nor children. I shall give the order to drive them away and fire on them. Such are my words to the Herero people.”
He later clarified that women and children were not to be shot:
“The shooting at women and children is to be understood as shooting above their heads, so as to force them to run away. I assume absolutely that this proclamation will result in taking no more male prisoners, but will not degenerate into atrocities against women and children. The latter will run away if one shoots at them a couple of times. The troops will remain conscious of the good reputation of the German soldier.”
*
But Kaveena & Miriam put a different spin on von Lotha. Some self-evident (and very familiar-sounding) fakery, from the article:
“Von Trotha confined survivors to camps, where captives were worked brutally hard and subjected to medical experiments. Some were sterilized; others were injected with arsenic and opium, or deliberately infected with smallpox, typhus and tuberculosis. An all-female camp was established for the purpose of sexual violence.”
OK, Miriam. Anything you say. (palm to face, sighing, shaking head) — Say there, Miriam — instead of piously posturing against the Germans; why not lead by example by writing a reparations check to some Palestinian family whose more recent ancestors were massacred at Deir Yassin and many other places, and whose property was stolen? What do ya say, Miriam? …… (sound of crickets)
The “indigenous peoples” (who had actually migrated to the German area, probably in search of work and a better life, as usual) were indeed forced out. Was there any other alternative in light of the massacre of Germans? We do not doubt that many Herero (who started the conflict) perished as a result of the war and the banishment; but we sense that the “80,000”(™ pending) number being bandied about these days has a certain “6 millionish” ™ malodorous scent about it — meaning, grossly exaggerated.
While researching this matter, a few clues point to a possible “handler” behind the rampaging Africans — a notorious global trouble-maker whose sordid history of arming and inciting savages to attack their enemies is actually spelled out in the American Declaration of Independence. Do the following dots connect? We believe they very well might:
* The African butcher Maherero decreed that no British were to be killed* The Africans were very well-armed and supplied. By whom?* The British welcomed and offered shelter to the Hereros who had fled to their territory.* The British and French inked the “Entente Cordial” in that very same year, 1904. The pact was an anti-German scheme which, 10 years later, would trigger World War I* During World War I, South Africa (by then a conquered outpost of the British-Rothschild Empire) took the German colony (and its diamond mines)
Betcha’ pounds sterling to crumpets that agents of the British Deep State and their Rothschild senior partners masterminded the murderous attack on the German colony in 1904. What do “youse guys” think?

1. General Lothar von Trotha was disgusted by the brutality of the Hereros. He dealt with them severely, but not unjustly. // 2. Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of July 4th, 1776: “He (British King George III) has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our Frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known Rule of Warfare, is an undistinguished Destruction, of all Ages, Sexes and Conditions.” // 3. The British-Rothschild syndicate wanted the whole of southernmost Africa. Only the German (red, white & black area) colony of Southwest Africa stood in their way.

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in The New York Times today that Germany paid reparations to Namibia for its 1904 genocide — but some say that wasn’t enough.
Boobus Americanus 2: So it wasn’t only the Jews that the Germans genocided then.
St. Sugar: From Romanss to Hunss to Mongolss to Moorss to Turks to French to Hereross — all the Germanss have ever done “wrong” is to defend themsselves.
Editor: Today, they are no longer permitted to do so, not even verbally.

Found at https://realnewsandhistory.com/01-03-24/

4 responses to “Germany Apologized for a Genocide. It’s Nowhere Near Enough.

  1. […] Germany Apologized for a Genocide. It’s Nowhere Near Enough. […]

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Anna Cordelia Avatar
    Anna Cordelia

    “…the Judaized Germans have, in recent years, been pounded over the head over their colonial-era ‘genocide’ in what is today the southwestern African nation of Namibia.”

    The moment I read this line to my husband (who grew up in South Africa) he laughed ruefully and said, “Are you kidding? Everyone knows the Germans were the gentlest colonizers around.”

    Liked by 2 people

    1. “Moreover, unlike the colonies of other nations, the colonial possessions of the German Reich were not acquired by conquest but instead by treaties and purchase. President Wilson solemnly pledged his word that Germany’s claims to its territorial possessions, as well as all others, would undergo just scrutiny.”

      • Adolf Hitler – speech before the Reichstag – reply to F D Roosevelt – Berlin, April 28, 1939

      Liked by 2 people

    2. It’s great to hear the truth.

      Liked by 2 people

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started