December 14, 2023
Rebuttal By
Imagine your favorite investigative journalist here penetrating the Manhattan Mendacity Factory and getting hired as a columnist for the oh-so-prestigious “paper of record.” What type of material would I submit? Well, certainly not any of the articles found here at RN&H / ANYT. Not only would such “hate speech” ™ be spiked long before it could reach the presses; but security goons would immediately escort my suddenly unemployed self out of the building with my box full of desk trinkets and photos in hand. No sir. An old-fashioned frontal assault on the (((usual suspects))) — coming from within the Belly of the Beast — would never work. The only way to capitalize on such a hypothetical opportunity would be to present the truth within the framework of a “critics say” narrative. “Hey — It’s not me saying this crazy stuff. I’m just reporting what those extremist nutjob antisemites actually believe.” This Op-Ed column by Bret Stephens (cough cough) — structured as a “Q & A Guide”– is a perfect example of something that mischievous Mike would try to sneak past an editor, if ever given the opportunity. This is not to suggest that Stephens has been a sleeper all along. His Jewish-to-the-core “street cred” resume is far too lengthy. A more plausible explanation would be that the Slimes has been placed under submission by the emergency military COG (Continuity of Government) operation; and is having material submitted in his name. Either that, or the desperation of the current situation has so emotionally rattled Stephens– and several others at the Slimes — that they are now consistently revealing things better left unspoken (here) (here) (here). In so doing, they are giving free publicity — and a degree of legitimacy — to subjects which have always been given the “silent treatment” in the past. Inadvertent or forced, this is a very useful — and shocking — article. Let’s review some of Stephens’s “Question & Answer” truth gems.
1. The Anti-New York Times — which seeks to bring the 80% – 99% Truthers to the very bottom of the rabbit hole — operates in a realm where direct and honest frontal assault on the (((usual suspects))) is required, and appreciated. // 2 & 3. The secret White Hats, agents like the imposter “Elon Musk” and, quite possibly, “Bret Stephens,” however, must operate within deeply brainwashed Normiedom (the Matrix) itself. That fantasy world requires a stealthy, subtle, soft and slow approach.
Question: What is antisemitism?Answer: It’s a conspiracy theory that holds that Jews are uniquely prone to use devious means to achieve malevolent ends and must therefore be opposed by any means necessary, including violence.
Mike’s Analysis: “Jews” accused of acting “deviously” and “malevolently?” Tell it, Bret. Tell it!
Question: So why do you call antisemitism a conspiracy theory? Isn’t it just simple bigotry against Jews?Answer: Antisemitism has expressed itself over the centuries as political opposition to Jews, religious hatred, cultural disdain, xenophobia or racism. It’s a shape-shifting virus that has adapted itself to the reigning prejudices of different eras. But a common thread linking one strain to another is that antisemitism typically takes the form of a conspiracy theory.
Analysis: Antisemitism has been in effect for “centuries” and Jews have always been accused of acting in a “conspiratorial” manner? Tell it, Bret. Tell it!
Question: Such as?Answer: Deicide, for starters — the idea that Jews got the Romans to kill Jesus.
Analysis: And indeed, they did. Indeed, they did. To quote the vulgar Jewish “comedienne,” Sarah Silverman: “I hope the Jews did kill Christ. I’d do it again. I’d f****ng do it again in a second!”
Answer: (continued): Later, in the Middle Ages, came the belief that plagues were caused by Jews poisoning wells.
Analysis: Those genocidal plagues — by the candid admissions of even some Jewish historians — somehow seemed to “pass over” the Jewish quarters. The “miracle” is attributed to Jews washing their hands more frequently than dirty goyim!”
Answer: (continued): Next, it was Jews using their financial power to start wars.
Analysis: Tell it, Bret. Tell it!
Answer: (continued): Or their control of media and Hollywood to manipulate public opinion and degrade public morals.
Analysis: Now I’m really thinking that this has to be “Bret Stephens,” — know what I’m sayin’?
Answer: (continued): Or their influence in Congress and the White House to take America to war in the Middle East and advance Israeli interests.
Analysis: This is way too candid and comprehensive. He’s got to be under submission or in Gitmo!
Question: Isn’t there some truth to the last point? Weren’t figures like Paul Wolfowitz largely responsible for taking the United States to war in Iraq?Answer: Actually, the people who took America to war in Iraq were George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld. Blaming second-tier Jewish officials for the actions of top-tier Christian officials is classic antisemitism.
Analysis: This “exchange” suggests that “second-tier” Jews such as Wolfowitz strongly influenced the “top tier” goy frontmen. That’s a key conversation point to keep alive.
Question: But if antisemitism is a conspiracy theory, why do so many people call anti-Zionism a form of antisemitism? Answer: Remember that antisemitism can also take the form of political hatred, and Zionism — that is, support for the existence of a Jewish state, as opposed to any of its policies — is today the principal expression of Jewish politics. But even anti-Zionism increasingly expresses itself as a conspiracy theory.
Analysis: The imaginary questioner actually seems to be getting the best of “Bret Stephens” here!
“Bret” accurately covers many of the classic “antisemitic” accusations! Medieval plagues casued by anti-Christ Jews poisoning wells in the middle of the night, banker wars, Hollywood degeneracy and the Israel Lobby. (Image 2 – German WW2 poster reads “He is to blame for the war!”
Question: How does anti-Zionism express itself as a conspiracy theory. Answer: Think of it this way: To the German antisemite, Jews were impostors and swindlers — impostors, because they claimed to be citizens of Germany –swindlers, because they were in the business of swindling “true” Germans out of their patrimony (heritage / inheritance). Analysis: Stephens just gave an accurate 100% unfiltered assessment of the attitude of the Germans. Answer: (continued): To the 21st-century anti-Zionist, Jews are impostors and swindlers — impostors, because they claimed to have ancestral ties to the Holy Land when anti-Zionists claim they are colonizers from Europe; swindlers, because they were swindling Palestinians out of their patrimony (heritage / inheritance). Analysis: He did it again! This time, giving an accurate 100% unfiltered assessment of the attitude of the Palestinians. Question: Israel is being widely accused of committing genocide.Answer: That accusation is also a form of antisemitism. It is manifestly false: If Israel really wanted to commit genocide in Gaza, it has the means to do so. Accusing Jews of the very crime of which they themselves were history’s greatest victim is a uniquely vile taunt. Analysis: “Stephens,” by excusing away “genocide,” is not helping to repair the reputation damage that Jews are increasingly sustaining now.
Question: I still think Israel’s response is inhumane, disproportionate and counterproductive. Answer: I disagree, but that’s entirely legitimate criticism, just as it’s legitimate to object to Israel’s settlement policy in the West Bank or to Benjamin Netanyahu’s extremist government. Analysis: Pay attention. Though he “disagreed,” Mr. “Stephens” clearly stated that calling Israel “inhumane” is “an entirely legitimate criticism” — and then he himself refers to Satanyahoo’s government as “extremist!” Question: I used to think of antisemitism mainly as a right-wing phenomenon, connected to racists like David Duke. But now all the talk is of antisemitism among people who think of themselves as progressives. How did that happen?Answer: Here’s a quote for you: “What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.” Joseph Goebbels? No, it’s Karl Marx. There’s always been a virulent strain of left-wing antisemitism, which the Soviet Union propagated throughout much of the Cold War. Analysis: Tell it, Mr. Marx. Tell it! The publication of this quote by Marx (cough cough) is astonishing for two reasons. First, it is highly incendiary. But beyond that, we need to understand that most Slimes readers hold Marx in high regard, or, at the very least, consider him a legitimate, though imperfect, “philosopher.” Given the audience here, Stephens is actually making a credibility statement! Stephens and his imaginary foil are essentially saying: “Ya know — it ain’t just those crazy right-wingers saying this about Jews. Many on the left can’t stand us rascals either — including the brilliant Karl Marx!” Question: I hope this isn’t an uncouth question but — why the Jews? Why has antisemitism mutated and persisted over so many centuries? Analysis: Spot-on and ballsy question, Mr. Interviewer! Bravo! This “uncouth” question usually marks the very beginning of the long journey down the rabbit hole. Answer: Jews have long stood for a set of ideas that, if not radical now, were radical in their time. Among them: monotheism, freedom, general literacy and what Jewish tradition calls “argument for the sake of heaven.” Analysis: Jews were hated because they were always ahead of the times??? Even the Boobus Brothers will have a hard time gulping down that kosherized excrement! Game, set, match to the hypothetical questioning entity here. Bret Stephens — or “Bret Stephens” — rigged the debate against himself, and lost badly. His Straw Man turned out to be a tenacious Iron Man! Was this done on purpose? Yeah — I think so, for this is EXACTLY what I would written if I had been planted within the enemy camp. Now, a surreptitious shot like this isn’t going to exactly transform worshippers of the Slimes in to stark raving “antisemites.” That’s not the intention here. But what this and so many other surprising recent reveals are accomplishing is the normalization of “legitimate” criticism of Israel and, by extension, the Jews. The Slimes is now giving us “permission” to at least hold intelligent conversations about this problem. If this unmistakable trend continues, it will be a BIG change in our political culture — and provide goyim like us with new opportunities to teach REAL history. Well played, “Bret.” Well played.
Jewish speakers and scribblers are very skilled at dishonestly setting up Straw Men that they will then effortlessly knock down. But Bret’s invented counterpart here turned out to be Iron Man, and Bret himself the weasel-worded weakling instead.
Twelve Years Not A Slave 
Leave a comment